AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
William of ockham philosophies1/4/2024 Christian Rode, A Companion to Responses to Ockham, Leiden, Brill 2016.Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought, Leiden, Brill 2008. Late medieval science, from the origins of the nominalist paradigm to the scientific revolution, Maggioli 1982. Francesco Bottin, The Science of Occamists.Catholic University of America Press (Wilfried Hartmann & Kenneth Pennington, eds.). The history of medieval canon law in the classical period. ^ In Enciclopedia Garzanti di Filosofia.^ In Dictionary of philosophy Treccani (2009).^ Dizionario di filosofia Treccani (2009), ibidem.^ Garzanti's Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ibid.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. A late Scholastic thinker, he is regarded as the founder of a form of nominalism, the school of thought that denies that universals have any reality apart from the. 1285, Ockham, Surrey, Eng.died 1347/49, Munich, Bavaria), English Franciscan philosopher, theologian, and political writer. Occamism had wide influence between the 14th and 17th centuries, contributing to the progressive dissolution of Scholastic Aristotelianism. William of Ockham, or William of Occam, (born c. Divine omnipotence also includes the idea that God can comprehend a nonexistent object: an anticipation of the "deceptive God", a theme Descartes used in asserting the certainty of the cogito ergo sum. Despite this, they posited God's absolute power to explain the contingency of creatures and the laws of nature. The Occamists using the nominalist method separate theology from Aristotelian foundations, making them lose any possibility of presenting themselves as science, and reducing confidence in the power of reason applied to supposed demonstrations of God's existence and any immortality of the soul. Criticism of the concept of cause and substance, especially by the Occamistic Nicholas of Autrecourt, reduces the sciences to immediate and intuitive ways of knowing. It is therefore necessary to revise the logical structures of discourse and language to separate the sign from the signified thing. The further one goes from experience and generalizes, the more one imagines the constitution of the universal expressed by names. The universals, which exist only in the mind, have no correspondence with reality and are mere signs that symbolize a multiplicity of individuals. Occamism questions the physical and Aristotelian metaphysics and, in particular, insists the only reality accessible to knowledge is intuitive.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |